Ramaphosa, i am disappointed!!

okay, i admit i dont know what to write about because all weekend i have not been felling well i mean i thought i was hear broken...but i have been able to read a few newspapers and to my attention the article by some white journalist who come from a rich white school speculation about how my hero Mandla Lamba is a successful business man yet the alligations of corruption and crime still hang over his head. lol think about it, a black man who is only twenty-five years old yet a "billionaire" of course that sounds suspicious right? i know what you thinking ha ha ha. black...young....man....billionaire in the same sentence not in south africa right? well i think its high time that if indeed the man is guilty of fraud misrepresenting himself let the law take its cause. however it is very interesting to find that already the media in south africa which is majority foreign owned is already judging the man! http://news.za.msn.com/gallery.aspx?cp-documentid=155204024  and check who is writting about him http://www.citypress.co.za/SouthAfrica/News/Mining-tycoon-a-lying-fake-20101107 well the only reason im writting this is because i admire the man and im disappointed in Mr. Ramaphosa for going public without even making contact with Mandla to find out. however the questin should be why is the media reporting that mandla resigned when he did'nt? why is he not arrested? what are the charges and why are they only known to CITY PRESS? if the allegations are truth against him why the F*** is he still free? oh well the man is said to be God fearing and humbled, so the truth shall come out soon enough.. but make up your mind and do not believe everything you read in the media in the majority foreign owned. perhaps the proposed media tribunal should come in so that the media can stop lying to us.

white journalist (above) Jacques Pauw

God fearing succesful business man  (below)
okay technology failed me anyways here links to check his photos out... http://www.google.co.za/images?hl=en&q=mandla%20lamba&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi and maybe to read on more about this young man who is an inpiration to me http://www.miningweekly.com/topic/mandla-lamba

plan to destroy black power?

it is an open secret that south africa was or is a racially divided country and that the 1994 elections and the TRC did not heal all of the pain black people suffered and people like Desmond Dudu are the one that made whites to undermine us even more. you disagree? okay every one is entitled to their own opinion so here's mine.

In 2005 a white farm owner fed his black employee to lions! dont believe me? here's a link http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4493623.stm and you would think he was arrested right. i mean thats what the law says well you are wrong. he was later released ITS ALRIGHT CAUSE ITS ALL WHITE http://newsone.com/nation/associated-press/white-south-african-man-released-after-throwing-black-man-to-the-lions/ . a lot of white people still live confortable lives at the expense of blacks why cause 1994 did nothing for the poor black majority who still live in "informal settlements". later a group of boys in the University of free-state humiliated our black mothers by 'an initiation' according to the media and they also got away with and some black people like the university's vice-chancellor still persisted on "reconciliattion" and "forgiveness" but funny enough non of the boys  asked for forgiveness or looked remoseful for their actions cause they knew they cant go to prison cause the law protects them and their right to education.

most recently, a metro (Black) police officer was brutally killed by a rugby player with his feasts and yes the rugby player is free and spending time with his family and kids which the poor black metro officer was  denied by the white beast! i how the fuck do you hit someone so hard until his last breathe and still be able to live with yourself?  how is it justified that a white man feeds a black poor man to lions and lives free? four university students feeding blacks women cleaners shit and still get away with it?  just because they can offord the best lawyers? who is the law protecting? is it protecting the ordinary man on the street or the man with a lighter skin pigmant and thicker wallet? this is a plan to destroy black people and if this is war BRING IT ON!! cause we wont stand being killed and humiliated by whites just because people like Johathan Jansen, Desmond Dudu and many more still preach reconciliation and forgiveness just because they are not directly affected by poverty, poor service delivery, battles to get better education for their children and all the struggles black people are faced with on a daily basis. Desmond Dudu do you still remember "when the white man came we had the land, they had the Bibble, now we havethe bibble and they have the land"? some people claim that we have political freedom and not economic freedom, I THINK WE HAVE NOTHING! beacause the law protects the white and the rich!

http://www.citypress.co.za/SouthAfrica/News/Metro-cop-dead-rugby-player-in-custody-20100827   http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Reitz-4-wait-to-hear-fate-20100728   this is a struggle and it only just began and the black man will have the ball....once more. only if we believe we can then we will! fuck all whites who still think they are better in anyway to black people!! fuck you and your money! fuck you and your Grandfathers who took our land! fuck all of you!! and to all whites who still try and accomodate and uplift blacks.....fuck you too cause you are steps ahead of us so we can't be talking about equal oppotunities if you are steps ahead so fuck you too!!

Intitutions of higher learning for the rich?

it is an open secret that access to higher learning in south africa and africa generally is higher. this is because of many variables which for the sake of space and time we shall not discuss here. one burning issue though is access, funding and maintaining students that are already in high intitutions of learning by giving financial, moral, academic and other forms of support for african students. it is for this reason some student movemnet organisation exist, to give support to needy students.

it is estimated that -4 out of ten students in first year actually graduate. is'nt it interesting? south africa in particular spends a considerable amount of the budget on education, health and skill development yet we still dont get the desired results. for instance upfront payment at Wits university in 2004 was below R3,000 yet in 2010 it was R6,600 and again it is suggested that next year it will incerase to + - R7,300. this is a clear indication that education is becoming commercial at the expense of poor south africans. although it has been said that this will not affect students on national financial student aid scheme (NFSAS) it was not metioned that NFSAS is not a busary but a loan! the suggested increment in the upfront payment was given no justification as far as the students are concerned, besides that the university is running at a deficit.

recently the SRC president Bafana Nhlapo and many others in the university have been individually taken into disciplinary hearings but what is more interesting is that they are representing student political organisations yet they are prosecuted individually? this is a deliberate attempt to indermine and intermidate the possibility of a strike this year and we will be told to bend over and we would....NEVER. when universities run out of  funds  the easiest way out is to increase fees yet Vice-Chancellors recieve bonuses from the the board, have private chefs in their offices among other poorly justified benefits.

if education is commercialised, any logical person knows what it means. it means more academic exclussion for poor black students on the basis that they cant pay their fees, blocked students cards and education will only be available to those that have money. when we black students protest we are excluded and undermined by disciplinaries that are aimed at weakening the unity of students....sadly many of these ideas are not spoken of in public cause you never know who is listening because you might end up not even finishing your degree and go back to the poverty you so desperately ran away from. where do we go to? im scared!! i want my mummy.... 

how and why money is created?

out of all the intitutions in the world from religious, to culltural and political institutions only one institution in the world is not challeged, The monetary systerm! ever wonder who creates money? how money is created and why? well, the answer is simple! the monetary system has been created in a sense that no one questions its legitimacy. i mean ever wonder what is sustainable about anything in this capitalist world? nothing! from the shoes you wear, the car you drive, sadly even theenviroment you live in.

modern money machanics was a document sent to the sanate in the USA and it begins by stating its objetcive "The purpose of this booklet is to describe the basic process of money creation in a "fractional reserve" banking system". it then continues what overwhelming economic terms to explain how money is created and what gives money "value". basically say the USA needs $10 billion it makes an application to the federal reserve to loan them the money but whats interesting is that the USA also prints impressive notes and calls them " bank reserves" and just like that the US has $10 billion more on their money supply! so whats the point? the point is the US makes a loan but never actually pays the loan back! so money is created out of debt! in other words debt is money and money is debt...

take it like this, every note of money ypu have in you wallet is owed to somebody by somebody. meaning if every one in the world including business and governments managed their budgets well, there would be no single note available in circulation. what this means is everysingle one of us is working for banks, you make a deposit of $100 in the bank the bank keeps a "fractional" of 10 % to be available to you and then the 90% is available for new loans. this simply means that money can only be created out ot debt, meaning there will always be people in our societies who are poor and in debt. i mean the monetary system makes sure that you work and not have enough money so you can go work again next month to pay off the things you could not afford to pay last month.

economists use big terms like inflation, hyperinflation, defaltion  and other terms that an avarage person like you and i cant understand. for instance inflation simply means "a persistent, substantial rise in the general level of prices related to an increase in the volume of money and resulting in the loss of value of currency". get it, zimbabwe today had hyperinflation meaning high inflaation because they had printed more money which made their money to lose "value". funny isnt it? so who decides what currency had value and which one does? i am afraid that one does not have all the answers but the point is that it is high time that intitutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, the reserve bank (of any country starting with the US), the federal reserve and other such intitutions be questioned on legitimacy and what gives them the right to take one money reserve 10% of it and make someone a loan out of someelses money and still charge interest on the money they never owned in the first place. less than 5% of the worlds money supply actually exists the other +90% exists in computers only. so if that is the case it means that some pockets in our societies will always be left out, simply because the money is not there for everyone! who usually gets left out? you got it right...the Black and uneducated.  so how can be solve problems of unemployment, poverty, femine and stavation if there is not enough money in the first place?

keep this in mind money is debt and debt is money. why? the answer is simple you are working for banks and fore-mentioned intitutions and as long as they exist there will be pepertual debt. but is'nt this slavery? you said it! is to make YOU the  UNEDUCATED BLACK to be poor and in debt so you would keep working for them!

xenophibia or Afrophobia?

a fear of foreigners or strangers? is it really? i think the government or rather the media was quick to name the attacks "xenophobic attacks" because if we work with the about definations it does not make sense. i mean the questions that should be asked are, why are they only aimed at black african nationals? why are white foreigners called investors ans tourists? foreign nationals live with us and they are not strangers to us. because the term "xenophobia" would mean that we do not know these people

lets see where they started and why in order to understand why they happened. we should also not promote any kind of violence to our fellow africanas. we are africans and w should stick together and help one another

the rainbow nation during the world cup

it is an open secret that sport in south africa has always been racially divided partly because of the previous regime but also because of the financial aspect of it. for instance it costs more money to play golf or cricket than it is to play soccer or netball hence we still find today that rugby is still dominated by whites.

it is equally interesting to find that during the FIFA would cup lots of whites in south africa suddenly supported soccer alongside their black fellow citizens but during PSL games we hardly see them at soccer mathes. one is not implying that whites were not supposed to be a part of the event but the point is they acted a "unted front" but we all know they never supported bafana some went as far as suporting European teams during the world cup.

south africans were mislead and told that the world cup would bring a lot of capital for the poor population but the reality was that only FIFA official patners really benefited, for instance you could'nt get a pepsi inside that stadium because Coca Cola was the official partner. i was personally one of the many south africans who were informally selling to visitors beverages and one has to point out the appalling conditions these people, myself included has to work under. some exists were closed for "security" reasons channelling costomers to one direction hecne most informal traders went back home with most the food.

while black south africans were working hard to make a living and taking opportunity of the world cup there were many measures in place to prevent black people from benefiting in any way, for instance some people stood at traffic lights to sell flags etc but some advocated that these people be arrested why because thay are blcak and they are not FIFA official partners....

its also amazing that white and black south africans stood behind their team but soon after the world cup, everything got back to "normal" blacks went back to making more money for the white elite and the whites still cotinue to exploit blacks. lastly, foreigners were suposed to have an african experiece but i doubt they did casue they were more whites in soccers city than ever before. why? because tickets were expensive to a point that only a few blacks could afford them. why? becuase you are Black!!